>>So I thought I'd ask the question: What is our MINIMUM expectations from having such a list, member-maintained, here on UT.
>
>Jim - I feel strongly that this is something which the Wiki is much better suited to accomodate and think everyone here should be encouraged to take advantage of the existing structure on the Wiki for this. There's no reason on earth to duplicate this effort.

First I should note that ChrisM has succeeded - the Bug List is now up and running here!!!!

But I'd also like to report that my look at Wiki, in the (hidden almost) CategoryVFPBugs or something like that, has less than 10 bugs listed. And if it is a "structure" then I sure couldn't figure it out when I did a search there on simply "bug".

And, as I said in a reply to GeorgeT, I personally have some problems with how Wiki works.
I dislike (and I KNOW some of these are the same reasons some people like Wiki):
1) the anonymity of the whole thing;
2) the general inability to isolate what's new in a topic when it show up on the "RecentChanges" list;
3) that stuff I may have taken considerable time to gather/write can be deleted anonymously

I also think that there's pretention that it is an "adult" place (i.e. where people can say what they need to say without fear of being banned) but in fact it is all handled by editing their stupid stuff out instead. They may as well be banned when their stuff isn't allowed to stand.

My 2¢ worth


>
>Tamar