>Whether you like it or not, Jim Nelson's point(s) are valid

Thats debateable (and no, I'm not interested)

>and stem from a genuine affection for VFP.

I do not doubt that JimN is a believer in VFP. I also do not doubt that JimD is a believer in SQL. I also do not see what your reply has to do with my reply.

JimN: Why don't you just let the Pro-VFPers be?
Me: Good question, but why don't you just let the Anti-VFPers be?