I totally agree, Bob. C# was fairly painless. It's .Net that's the trouble. Though as I start to get it more and more, I'm starting to feel more and more like it's worth it.

I went with C# because I think VB.Net won't entirely escape the baggage associated with the fact that it is still a BASIC derivative, albeit mostly in name.

>Hi Kev,
>
>I agree with Cetin, the keywords in C# have a lot in common with VFP. My transition was to C# was fairly painless, it was the .NET framework that had the steep learning curve. It was well worth the effort.
>
>Regards