Thanks for that - just wanted to make sure that I wan't doing something silly. It's a pity - I was happy to have found somewhere that the use of a collection and FOR EACH made good sense and it is buggy. Oh well - I'll add it to the bug list if it isn't already there.

>Hi Jamie,
>
>Yup, I see the same. Looks like another quirk of the collection FOR EACH - FWIW avoiding it seems to work:
>