I didn't blame you for anything.

>>We are talking about updateable views, Aleksey, in which case modifying the view cursor should be not different than modifying the base table - think about that...
>
>The world we are living in is far from perfect. You want to blame someone for your mistake? Fine, you may blame me. I have nothing to add to the subject.
>
>Thanks,
>Aleksey.
>
>>
>>I don't expect VFP help to be perfect, I just asked you to point me to the part that I was missing - your answer did not help with that.
>>
>>The most disappointing part is your assumption that that it is still not clear for me how it works and I should try it. Obviously, not only I tried it, I posted a repro code for you. Yes, RECALL works with updateable views, but incorrectly.
>>In regard to me being reasonable... I can’t accept that the current behavior is not a bug, but I can accept that it is not going to be changed – if you don’t understand the problem, how could you solve it?
>>
>>
>>>Hi Doru,
>>>
>>>Well, RECALL does work with view and there is no reason to disable it.
>>>Modifying view cursor and modifying base table are two different operations, think about that.
>>>VFP help is not perfect, but, after reading help about view properties, anyone will understand that SQL commands are used to update a base table. After all, if it is still not clear how it works, try it out before relying on some assumptions.
>>>
>>>Doru, please be reasonable, current behavior is not a BUG and it is not going to be changed.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Aleksey.