Jim,
It's for people that have considered the evolution of VFP and decided to drop it completely. I tried to phrase the choices from each extreme and include the middle ground, but, none of this is perfect in all regards and it's definitely not a scientific survey.
>While I think you are correct, Claude, I really wonder at the specific choice of 'drop it in favour of .NET".
>I simply don't see how that is in ANY way an "evolution" of VFP.
>You may have meant it as what MS should do but my bet is that those selecting that choice did so on the basis of what they feel THEY (the voter) should do.
>
>
>>Tracy,
>>Some people get overly enthusiastic with new technology until reality sets in!
>>>I was really surprised by your poll results Claude! More than I thought would chose 'Dropped completely, USE .net' which makes no sense. If you are going to stop using VFP completely and use .net instead, what difference does it make to you if VFP continues or not?
>>>
>>>>New poll - How would you like to see VFP evolve? at http://www.activevfp.com