Hello Jim;
>
>The most important thing that I want to say is that while some VFP MVPs have also been named as .NET MVPs I still see those specific people on the VFP forums and fully active in the VFP community!

They are two/tree-times MVP, what amazing thing.. Those people give us the real meaning of the M.V.P. (If to have the second title, they didn't have to burn any previous title)

But, with this nomination (of these 4 'guys') it is been tremendously clear the intention of: Let's fix all the suitcases and the last one to leave, Please turns off the lights.

>...Some of them have also stated publicly that they have not in ANY way 'given up' on VFP, but rather they have simply also become users of .NET development tools.

I didn't see, any manifestation different from some articles: Migrating of VFP for C# (I can be wrong. But, I didn't see)


>...I have also seen at least one say that, in his opinion, .NET has some way to go yet (evolutionarily) before it can be considered a good high-productivity tool [he also said he thinks it will be that sooner than later].

:) ...Here is a great niche for our dear Ken Levy ..Please Ken, be my guest, jumping in !!

>I note too that this place is called Universal Thread, not VFP Thread, and my guess is that it won't be long before .NET forum traffic exceeds VFP forum traffic. It may do so already, for all I know.

But when this becomes true, my dear Michel will have the double of responsibilities (mainly on the editorial of the magazine)

There is available spaces for everybody.. But, therefore some cares must exist, as mutual respect ( from all of us/MVPs and from UT's staff in special )


Claudio