Hi patrick
>(Germans discussing in English...)
one has to practice...
>works as well with the coverage profiler....

>Thanks, simple and good idea.
Simple- yes. but has a few knacks in it:
many function calls added together in 1 line and so on.

>I had hoped somebodey did this before (f.ex.
documenting in a way that a double or iterating call is just once shown with a *-sign before - etc).

I think Lisa Slater had a few ideas extending the coverage profiler with XML. There might have been a visualization thrown into it via looking a through IE.

>But I think once I have time to do it nicely I will start and tell you (if >you don't have something nicer already).
Nice - never. Something barely working getting the correct numbers and so well documented that even I scratch my head at least 5 times before running it (half a year later again...) to find some troublesome spots in performance.

It will ease perhaps the first basic steps like importing, marking the lines where the level changes and so on, give you cursor's to check against verifying your results. Something more optical would be nice for me as well - i usually get to the relevant calls by filtering through a few sql calls. If you are going forward, we can surely exchange our "tools".

Regards,

thomas

Patrick