Hi Sergey,
>According to MS it's a feature not a bug and it's done this way for performance reason
This is smoke in the eyes.
In fact:
On VFP documentation is written,
"VARTYPE( ) is similar to the TYPE( ) function, but VARTYPE( ) is faster and does not ..."
VARTYPE() eval function correctly ( MS have lose the performance reason),
ma not eval array correctly.
The problem is [] and () ambiguity on VFP language.
If for MS this bug is a feature, ok. I do not have VFP sources and I have not acquired a million of VFP licenses to upgrades in order to force the MS to correct it.
We keep this nth error.
Fabio
Précédent
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement