Hello,
>>>Novell's Transaction Tracking System. My experience with it hasn't been good. We needed exclusive use of tables to make it work.
>>PMFJI, but my experience with TTS was very good. I wrote an application
>>that was used by 15-20 users concurrently and I would say that without TTS
>>this application never could be so secured from power failures (and user's
>>failures too < g >)... Before
>>implementing TTS transaction processing, we (I and my former boss) made
>>extensive set of test (turning down server, WS, both etc) and we saw that
>>TTS is only way to go... Pity that MS still not have something like on
>>NT...
>Hi Vlad,
>I believe it's true for you say it. I also have bad stories with TTS. My version was 3.11. I might also set it wrong. Could you pls tell me the version and how you set TTS.
Novell versions were from 3.11 to 4.1 (I didn't try a latest version of
Intranetware, but friend of mine told me that it's ok too). Honestly, I
don't remeber how I set up this creature exactly, but I'm able to recall
some details.
1. We set the logical transaction level to 5 or more
2. Increased number of TTS space on Netware volume
3. Very short time of transactions...
4. Of course, we had an UPS on server ;)
6. Increased numbers of allowed locks
If you're interested in more details, tell me and I will call my friend and
ask him... Sorry, but I do not have any Novell at home (it's quite
expensive < g >)
* Human is a question asked by birth and answered by death. Machine is another kind of question with another kind of answer