>>David,
>>
>>'&&' is documented in Fox 2.6 help as I pointed out in my previous post.
>>Anyway, is '&&' is implemented or not can be verified w/o help file. In Fox 2.6 the following line throws 'syntax error'. Separating '&' eliminates the error.

* Syntax error
>>lcText = "abs&&"
>>* No errors
>>lcText = "abs&" + "&"
>>

>>
>
>same results in Fox2.5

Hi Gunnar,

Thanks for confirming it for Fox 2.5