>>>>David,
>>>>
>>>>'&&' is documented in Fox 2.6 help as I pointed out in my previous post.
>>>>Anyway, is '&&' is implemented or not can be verified w/o help file. In Fox 2.6 the following line throws 'syntax error'. Separating '&' eliminates the error.
>>>>lcText = "abs
>>>>* No errors
>>>>lcText = "abs&" + "&"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>same results in Fox2.5
>>
>>Hi Gunnar,
>>
>>Thanks for confirming it for Fox 2.5
>
>Hi Sergey
>
>You are welcome
>
>just checked in Fox2.0 - also the same results there (that's as far back as i can go)
Thanks.
--sb--