Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
You should have let them in
Message
From
27/07/2003 16:09:45
Hilmar Zonneveld
Independent Consultant
Cochabamba, Bolivia
 
 
To
26/07/2003 19:22:49
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
Immigration
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00813415
Message ID:
00813933
Views:
8
Thanks. Yes, I thought it applied only to Cubans, but I still don't see what difference there is between reaching the shore, or not doing it!

>SNIP
>>
>>I don't quite understand why they let people into the U.S. if they happen to reach the shore, and not otherwise. Seems like a fairly arbitrary criterion to me. Does anybody know what is the reasoning behind this policy?
>
>I don't KNOW, Hilmar, but I'll give you a guess.
>
>Firstly, be aware that this policy (reaching land) only applies to Cubans. Any other illegal immigrant arriving the same way is likely to be sent home, even if found out only years later.
>
>My THEORY is that instant acceptance used to apply to any Cuban who made it into the U.S. territorial waters. But at some time, for some reason, this was changed to the present policy. Possibly because, every now and then, President Castro used to empty the jails and 'invite' the (ex-)convicts to take a swim to the U.S. They may have even provided vehicles.
>Now the rule applies to Cubans because of the special case Cuba presents, the Communist regime/Bay of Pigs/Missile Crisis all being factors.
>
>By the way I agree that the resourcefulness displayed should have made their entry permitted and celebrated.
Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform