>>
>>"Mad" Matt, good to see you. Where you been lately?
>>
>
>busy as heck. doing mostly observing instead of posting.
>
>
>>Makes you wonder about the EuroTunnel doesn't it? That thing's more than 2 gig, yet they've managed to find a workaround that meets their performance needs.
>
>EuroTunnel uses a single table that's over 2 GB?? I thought that wasn't possible? {Although I've got a couple of Dragan's lightbulbs now -g-}
>

Nah, they've partitioned it. (Dragan will want those light bulbs back, BTW).

>In any case. I agree with Ed that hard rules shouldn't be set, but I still think that trying to account for the 2GB barrier may be counter productive.
>
>BTW - can you elaborate on what you know about EuroTunnel? Is there a developer's website that has some info. I'm very curious.

There was an article in FoxPro Advisor, about a year ago, I guess. Can't remember the exact details, however. As for a website, I don't know. I think you could find the issue on the advisor site, however.