>>Don't you think that you are over-dramatizing just a little bit here?... I surely do!
>>
>>You seem to think that good and adequate testing is impossible UNLESS there is some >external (or possibly even internal, I suppose) "testing tool" available. I beg to >differ.
>
>And you have arrived at this assumption based on what? I don't want to get into an argument over semantics but I certainly do not appreciate the tone of your reply.
SNIP

I arrived at the 'conclusion' based on your I too have responded with "no formal testing" which equates in many business minds to "no testing" which I'm sure you would all agree is simply not wise in this day and age., the tone of which I found objectionable. No doubt my tone betrayed this, which I consider to be "mission accomplished".

The balance of your post here (snipped) was a much stronger/balanced argument in favour of automated test tool(s) for VFP. Again I encourage you to add this to the UT Wish List if it is not already there or to lend your support by comment/rating if one that fits is there.

JimN