>>And accurate to 2 decimal places to boot! Just more b******t statistics put together from questionable data at best. I couldn't begin to decipher how they were derived. With the thousands of users here that chose not to participate, added to the thousands that are not here at all, does this 50% mean anything? I think not. And I can state for a fact that the world wide survey is biased by at least one datum :-)
>
>I think that's what we call 50% +/- 50% :-)

LOL! Bruce, I was going to ask you to drop in here :-) Glad to see it wasn't necessary. And I think you are correct. Makes sense to me, anyway...