>Hi Sergey,
>
>>Becouse there is no reason to implement it this way.
>
>Reason there is, code is fast and cleaner.

Can you prove that it's faster? It is certenly isn't cleaner.

>
>>The correct way to use it according to VFP help is
>INSERT INTO (ALIAS()) .....
>
>Where ?

From VFP help:
"INSERT INTO dbf_name
Specifies the name of the table to which the new record is appended. dbf_name can include a path and can be a name expression".
>
>>IMO, it shouldn't work the way it works in other SQL command either.
>
>Strange, VFP have 4 command,
>3 support a (ALIAS()) and ALIAS() ( VFPT do more job for get they)
>and 1 support only ALIAS() ( a obvious forgetfulness of VFPT )
>and you conclude that the VFPT has made 3 errors on 4.

I didn't say that. It's your own conclusion.

>
>I apply this rules:
>- "on unknown process i must choose the minimum cost choice"
>- "on unknown process i must choose the most probable event"
>- "if on unknown process the minimum cost choice and the most probable event
>are the same, then I am much neighbor to the truth"

I don't see how is it relevant.