>Hi Craig,
>That actually makes sense to me. But it leaves a few questions.
>
>To borrow a quote from Marcia Akins.
>Does OOP demand that we "crack walnuts with a sledge hammer" rather than use one of those functions that you have to throw data at?
>
>Example:
...
I agree with this. But the original question was whether it was OOP, not whether it was the most efficient <g>.
Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)
