Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Boycott / Sell Sprint Corp.
Message
From
16/08/2003 01:47:46
Al Doman (Online)
M3 Enterprises Inc.
North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
 
 
To
15/08/2003 17:18:39
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00818354
Message ID:
00820707
Views:
23
>>>I stand firmly by my position that **ALL** humanity, in **EVERY** endeavour, is **EXPECTED** to put morality/ethics at the very **TOP** of their agenda. It doesn't matter if it is a corporate decision or a personal decision. Business has NOT been conferred special rights or privileges in society as regards ethics.
>>
>>Hi Jim,
>>
>>Can you point me to a for-profit company whose motto or slogan talks about ethics or morality?
>
>No I can't, nor do I have to! I EXPECT ***YOU*** place ethic/morals highly but I don't expect that you go around reminding me or anyone else of that fact. The same goes for me and the same goes for everyone everywhere.
>That one is working at a business does NOT exempt them from making ethical/moral decisions while at work.
>
>The fact of the matter is that virtually everything DEPENDS ON everyone placing ethics/morals at the top of their list. We have police and regulators who address those who do not.
>
>Many companies, a while back, got big into the "Company Charter" stuff and I can assure you that every one that I have read - possible a dozen or so - mentioned legal/ethical/moral in more than 1 place in that charter.
>
>You are not alone - many (way too many) people seem to give business an exemption from ethics/morals, reasoning, I suppose, that their mandates for profit supercede ethic and morality. Such logic is flawed in the extreme.

Sorry, Jim, mine was another semi-rhetorical question, to make a point. If, as you contend, businesses are expected to put morals/ethics at the "very top of their agenda", you'd think that some would include them in their mottos/slogans. Since few seem to, I'm forced to conclude that, in the real world of business at least, they are not as important as you think they should be.

I believe that businesses work in terms of "enlightened self-interest". Very simply, successful ones tend to be ethical/moral - just as most of their people are. OTOH if top bosses (e.g. at Enron) are corrupt, does that mean the company is as well? If we replace a Ken Lay with a Rudy Giuliani or a Warren Buffet, is Enron still a corrupt company?

Contrary to what you or others may think, I don't believe that business should be unethical, or should ignore ethics - it isn't in their best interests.

Although this branch of the discussion is interesting, it's off-topic. Unless, you're arguing that Sprint is being immoral or unethical in outsourcing IT jobs overseas.
Regards. Al

"Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent." -- Isaac Asimov
"Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right." -- Isaac Asimov

Neither a despot, nor a doormat, be

Every app wants to be a database app when it grows up
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform