>Hey Craig,
>
>Don't take this personally, but where's the positive view and the can do spirit. It seems you only have reasons why it can't be done or why it would be a bad idea.

Because I think it would be a bad idea.

>I check my windows update every couple of days and encourage our clients to do the same.

Even better, I set windows update to be automatic. Even then, it only does Critical Updates, which would miss VFP runtimes.

>If the VFP runtime was dropped in there whenever it was updated, I'd just say go, and voila, I'm updated, etc. There have been other positive reasons suggested here that have a VFP marketing impact as well.

>
>If it can be done, it should be done. No doubt about it.

Really? What if it cost $100,000/year to do this? Would it be worth it then? (I'm not saying that's the cost...just a hypothetical.)

>
>Ken? What's it take?
>
>
>Regards,
>Chris.
>
>