Hi Tom,

Might you be in a position to try one of those SNAP! servers?... They're cheap enough and being in the U.S. you might have high availability of such units.

Jim Livermore, a 'resident' of UT, has only good things to say about them and his is REAL WORLD use too.

Here's their web site: http://www.snapappliance.com/

and here's a review: http://www4.tomshardware.com/network/20020919/index.html

My thought is that Win98 is really a 'weak' file server with little of a future.

Again, good luck.


>Hi Jim - Ironically we ran a test this morning, moving from VFP 7.0 to VFP 8.0. Used Windows 2000 Server as the file server. Work stations were Windows 98 and Windows XP Professional. The upgrade had no effect on the problem. 1st user in received excellent response time, subsequent users coming on suffered a slow response (30-40 seconds before we got a logon screen, 12 seconds to refresh a form after a find. This article looks interesting and I too will be following up. The only solution thus far has been Windows 98 as the file server. Doesn't make any difference if it is a VFP 7 or VFP 8 executable.
>
>I was glad to see you bring this up again because I had just about given up hope. Next step I guess is to talk to Microsoft directly.
>
>Regards, Tom
>>Marcus,
>>
>>I read the following in a Technet Flash and thought of your problem.
>>
>>http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;328237
>>
>>Don't know if it applies, and it doesn't offer a fix for you, but it is "interesting" to you, I'm sure.
>>
>>cheers
>>
>>>Tom,
>>>
>>>thanks for your reply.
>>>I tried Win98 as DataServer and it works, unfortunately this is no solution for production...
>>>Have you ever tried to put data on a Linux server, or have you got a chance to try this ? Just another idea.
>>>
>>>Marcus