I see. Thanks

>>I have found that UPDATE is much, much slower then REPLACE for tables with Buffering = 5 and a small ( or any ) ammount af deleted records. Table has about 100,000 records. Does anyone have any idea or a workaround?
>>
>>Thanks, Mark
>
>Hi Mark,
>
>Take a look into message #799959.
>
>Thanks,
>Aleksey.