Rodman,

Any particular reason why you are limiting this to "pure" COM implementation. AFAIK, Rick's framework supports COM and I am not aware that it is any "less pure" than not using it.

FWIW, this is an interesting discussion. IMO, approx 1% of all active VFP developers have or still does actively write VFP Components. This number excludes those who dabble and play with the technology on an academic level.

For the most part, I think you are going to find that private sites will be your most likely candidates. Companies that invest large sums of money, far more often than not - will use somethign else - whether it be Java, .NET, etc.

< JVP >
>I am curious,
>
>Has anyone here actually used VFP to build a MTDLL and hosted it on their web site.
>
>If so can you tell me what the site does and point me at the site.
>
>I want pure COM architectures not a west wind hosted site. I know Ricks's stuff works fine for this I just want to see a real site with a VFP-COM object called from ASP or ASP.NET (or some other technology capable of calling COM objects)
>
>
>Rodman