Hi Nadya

Yes, but everything must be within reason.

Over the last couple of months I have seen more 'discoveries' reported from Fabio than I have read about over the last two decades in Databased Advisor, FoxPro Advisor, Foxtalk plus numerous other magazines and books. Whatever does not fit into Fabio's idea of how VFP should work, is reported as a bug, strange behaviour or as helpful tips. And if someone have the courage to say straight up that Fabio is a little bit picky, or straight up wrong, Fabio just ends the discussion with some insulting remarks, saying in practice that he is right and everyone is stupid because they can not see it the way he sees it. And then he usually just starts a new thread with more or less the same topic.

I favour the openness of UT, and I absolutely don't want to act as a police or a judge, but sometimes it must be allowed to say that enough is enough?

I think maybe Michel Fournier should consider setting a maximum of how many new threads one user can create. Especially when most of the threads from one user in reality is more or less an old thread with a very small twist.


>>Hi Fabio
>>
>>Please talk english, not metaphores. If you want to drive on the edge, you also risk to go over the edge. If you are a pilot and you notice your airplane does not go over the highest top, you fly through a valley.
>>
>>Myself when I notice VFP behaves strangely, I notice it and find another way to solve my problem. And unless I think most people are interested in hearing about it, I keep my mouth shut. As I say, that is what I do.
>>
>Well, in some cases your little discoveries can save someone's time. So, there should be a balance between what to tell and what is really to keep...