Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Code Standards
Message
De
29/09/2003 14:10:17
Walter Meester
HoogkarspelPays-Bas
 
 
À
29/09/2003 12:09:46
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
COMCodebook
Titre:
Divers
Thread ID:
00832733
Message ID:
00833243
Vues:
38
Hi

>>While it could be a good book, how does it in any way validate your coding standard. By only saying you've adapted the standard, there might be giant leap to your interpretation to the VFP language. The book does not describes language specific items, so it certainly is not a basis for VFP specific claims you make here.

>Until you read the book, you can't say it doesn't.

Nor do I have the prove that it does. When I have to guess on the solidness of your whole article I fear the worst.

>>Then don't make claims that aren't true or incomplete. Esspecially those about when to use a certain VFP command or performance thing while at the least it is not complete and in most cases it is just false. While somthing could be easy to digest, how do you know if you're digesting the right stuff. If you're making claims, pleas provide it in a form which is easy to digest but DOES provide background information that is correct.

>Show me where you think it's not correct. I saw your earlier posting about m. and your testing is flawed. When making a test, you need to understand how the results are affected by environmental issues.

Well tell me the issues because I can't come to your conclusion

I've run the same test on m. on every version DOS/Windows version of Fox since 2.0 and still come up with the same results.

And you said my test was flawed ?! Again I'm getting confused. I've tun this under VFP 8 and can't see any difference either on WInXP or Win2K. What test did you do and what is the performance difference ?

Re-read my other replies about the macros etc. Your standpoint is incorrect there also.


>Exactly... I've posted that the standards are mine and your opinion may differ, yet you continue to state that the standards are wrong. How can they be wrong if they are an opinion and there is no right or wrong standard?

So you're admitting that there are no facts in there but only opinions ?

So the statements about performance are just opinions ?
The satements about its wise to avoid macros are just an opinion ?

See my previous post about the sample article....

Walter,
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform