Hi Dorin ! Thanks.
Interesting link. All that seems rather sad.

>Hi,
>I found a very interesting topic about this:
>http://fox.wikis.com/wc.dll?Wiki~VFPTableConcurrency
>
>
>>It it sad but is seems to be continous tendency that to solve a problem with VFP one must go otside VFP.
>>
>>>>Hi Dorin ! Thanks.
>>>>I have FLUSH command after all commands that change data.
>>>
>>>We can have as many FLUSH commands as we want, seems that OS/network components/whatever... doesn't care about this. We must know various settings that affect network operations on shared files and to change these settings at server and client size (network client cache, locking, file handles cache, etc). This is not normal.
>>>
>>>I remember something about querying RECCOUNT() function having as result a disk flush at server side, but I'm not sure.
>>>
>>>>What else can I try ?
>>>
>>>A true database server :-) (At least for new projects)
>>>
>>>
>>>>As regard as second parameter "If you specify a value for nSeconds1 other than 0 but don't include nSeconds2, nSeconds2 is set to the same value as nSeconds1" so SET REFRESH TO 1 is equivalent of SET REFRESH TO 1, 1.
>>>>Despite that, in a desperacy act I tried to use also SET REFRESH TO 1, 1 - without good result as you can see.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>