Hey Fred!

>Isn't that essentially what Heisenberg thought that in observing something, you are actually "adding to"/"modifying" the process being observed? In that way, you can never have a complete "circle" since further observations will lead to further additions/modifications. Quite a vicious circle! ;)

Not quite. My paper right now is divided in three sections and I've posted the first two. The 3rd section immediatly jumps into something I call "the mechanism of observation" which has quite a bit to do with Heisenberg (and beyond).

But the idea of the thread so far mostly revolves around applying Godel's Theorem to nature, something that isn't often thought of as a logical system even though it is.