You think that perhaps he would'nt be open-minded enough ? <g>

Too bad for the rejection that I got. I won't lose sleep over it. It really looks like MS is holding the truth here.

Ken says that MVP awards distribution have been that way for a long time. Does this really mean that it's been the right way to do it? No place whatsoever for improvement?

Ken has been saying for a long time that it was also up to us (member of the VFP community) to help him better market VFP.

Perhaps what I suggested was not OK. I can understand that it could get in the way with MS politics. OK but could'nt there be alternatives to what I suggested?

But if the suggestions are really that bad then perhaps the guidelines are'nt clear enough?

But when I receive just a simple NO as an answer I'm sorry but I can't adjust myself to make better suggestions in the future.

There's a known fact. If you ask for help but you keep rejecting every suggestions thrown at you you'll receive less and less of those suggestions.



>I like it when he says it's that way because it's been done that way for the last 10 years - must be a Republican...
>>>FWIW, I think it's a good idea...
>>>>>>So would'nt it be a good idea to list all the things that were done by a given MVP so we know what led to receive that recognition?
>>>>>
>>>>>No, it is an award, a gift, as a sign of appreciation. Microsoft is under no obligation to disclose information on the internal award process and decisions. The MVP program has been like this for over 10 years.
>>>>
>>>>I understand. It was just a suggestion.
>>
>>I was only hoping that at least one of my suggestions would get a sort of approval.