Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Sex in the Holy City
Message
From
10/10/2003 13:56:08
 
 
To
10/10/2003 13:40:30
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00837332
Message ID:
00837549
Views:
35
Also those innocent victims who have died from AIDS because their trustworthy partner (referring to hetero here) were not so trustworthy afterall I guess are responsible because they loved and trusted someone who made the wrong lifestyle choice?

Just thought I'd point out that the parens aren't necessary. Someone in a gay monogomous (sp?) relationship who isn't told the partner's condition would be just as innocent. Or what if the partner didn't know, either?

It's a disease, a horrible disease, one that I'm lucky to have never seen anyone suffer from. Unless someone deliberately infects themself or others, I see no reason to blame them for their condition, even if they engaged in risky behaviour. I get into my car every day knowing how many people die in car accidents. If someone smashes into me, is it my fault for getting in the car? Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that it's a good idea to engage in risky behaviour. I just don't like the distinction that if someone gets it from a transfusion that they're a poor innocent victim, but if they get it for having gay sex or being addicted to drugs that, well, it's just their own damn fault then.

Michelle
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform