>Ok, I may not live in San francisco, but I know some AIDS victims personally. Explain to me how someone who is young (teens), has had surgery and a blood transfusion in the past, but who has had no sexual contact yet in their lifetime can contract aids and have Public Health list it as not having been contracted from a blood transfusion or via donating blood? It is all a government coverup to prevent the public from being afraid to donate blood or receive blood transfusions.

I agree 100%. The reality is disgusting. However, it is business as usual for every organization concerned. I have been listening to the safety of blood for 18 years and it really has not changed. For 43 years I have seen people I know die of cancer. Should I believe the “system”? If you survive our system for any length of time consider yourself fortunate.

Tom

>
>
>>>SNIP
>>>> However, Aids is acquired by a life style of choice and we must do everything possible to promote whatever is popular be it by a minority or the majority. On second thought forget the majority. Minorities are more vocal and in greater need.
>>>
>>>All those family members of people who have died from AIDS due to blood transfusions might disagree with you Tom.
>>>
>>>Also those innocent victims who have died from AIDS because their trustworthy partner (referring to hetero here) were not so trustworthy afterall I guess are responsible because they loved and trusted someone who made the wrong lifestyle choice?
>>
>>Tracy;
>>
>>Remember where I live. I have seen a few things happen in San Francisco and am more aware of the politics of Aids then most. Most people that die from Aids cannot be attributed to blood transfusions.
>>
>>In 1985 the American Red Cross stated that our blood supply was entirely safe as it was tested for Aids. Such a statement is irrefutable. The headline of a daily San Francisco Chronicle newspaper stated in 1960, “Cancer Cured”! These statements must be true. Or are they?
>>
>>Tom