>I am definitely not a fan of a sequence of DO CASE statements that are deliberately coded to "do work" (in the conditions themselves) and to ALL run in the sequence coded. To me that 'style' is a pure corruption of the intention of DO CASE.
>
I often corrupt <g> the DO CASE.
I put the real work within the CASEs.
The alternative is usually to use nested IF - ENDIFs.
And I personally HATE those.