Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Table naming conventions
Message
 
 
To
23/10/2003 13:57:33
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00841018
Message ID:
00841742
Views:
24
Glen,
Thank you so much for your input.

>Dimitry.
>
>>>
>>>I find singular more convenient.
>>>
>>
>
>I Think it is a little more complex than this. On a large Database it is a great maintenence advantage to easily group child tables with the Parent For instance. You can have a table called User for a list of users. Great. If you store all of the user preferences in a table called UserPreference, and a table for user state stored in a table called UserState, and a table that contains user access rights for variious things stored in a table called UserAccess, then all of these tables are always grouped together in the database when you want to look at them. When you have 60 or 70 or a hundred tables this is a major convenience. Going all over the database to look into relevent tables is a pain in the neck.
>
>Maybe a better example I have is this. I have in one application a full Policy model and a full Investment tracking model, each with around 10 or so supporting table. By using a good naming convention, children having double names, I can have almost all of them (not quite all) grouped by relationship.
>
>Final thought:
>Parent = Singular Name,
>Child = Double Name
>GrandChild = More.
>
>Regards,
"The creative process is nothing but a series of crises." Isaac Bashevis Singer
"My experience is that as soon as people are old enough to know better, they don't know anything at all." Oscar Wilde
"If a nation values anything more than freedom, it will lose its freedom; and the irony of it is that if it is comfort or money that it values more, it will lose that too." W.Somerset Maugham
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform