Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
LOCATING backwards
Message
De
24/10/2003 12:05:32
Cetin Basoz
Engineerica Inc.
Izmir, Turquie
 
 
À
24/10/2003 11:57:23
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Codage, syntaxe et commandes
Divers
Thread ID:
00842157
Message ID:
00842218
Vues:
20
>Sorry Cetin ( fast write )
>
>this is correct:
>
>CREATE CURSOR t2 (f2 I )
>RAND(3)
>FOR K=1 TO 500
>INSERT INTO t2 VALUES (100*RAND())
>NEXT
>SET FILTER TO f2=1
>GO BOTTOM  && this is sufficient
>SET FILTER TO
>BROWSE
>
>
>Fabio

No it's not. What you get is only the last record. A locate command supports continue and found. This doesn't.
Well suggesting skip -1 would be overkilling. You might not know if intention is doing a scan while...endscan or alike.
An index is the way to go IMHO. If no index exists creating an index with a dummy key does well (IMHO every table should have such an index) :

index on .t. tag myLocator

set order to tag myLocator descending

Cetin
Çetin Basöz

The way to Go
Flutter - For mobile, web and desktop.
World's most advanced open source relational database.
.Net for foxheads - Blog (main)
FoxSharp - Blog (mirror)
Welcome to FoxyClasses

LinqPad - C#,VB,F#,SQL,eSQL ... scratchpad
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform