>Houston,
>
>First, my apologies for not get back with you on this. Until recently I've been pretty "snowed under".
>
>Second, from what I've seen of the code, Christof's right on-target with his analysis (as always< bg >). I'd add that I wish that I had thought of it.
I think I missed something here. Where is Christof's analysis?
Mark McCasland
Midlothian, TX USA