You will make a terrific lawyer because the more I read you the less I understand what you're saying. ;-)

>Perhaps - but what one believes is irrelevant when objective evidence is required. When a person makes an assertion - some form of objective evidence (direct or circumstantial) must be offered in support. Lacking that - the assertion is really just wishful thinking - and there is a big difference.
>
>< JVP >
>
>
>
>>>>1. Sam accuses Dave of stealing $20
>>>>2. Bob asks Sam how he knows that Dave stole $20.
>>>>3. Sam ask's Bob how he knows Dave did not steal $20.
>>
>>Perhaps Sam believes he is omniscient and can therefore demand proof of everybody else without ever offering any himself.