You know John, I'm at the point of frustration with you. No matter what anyone says positive about VFP, you must shoot them down. I'm just waiting for the first time you misstate something in a legal document for a client and another attorney eats you for lunch. I can show you simple mistakes that lawyers with years of experience have made that first year law students shouldn't make.

As for MS plans beyond Europa, when has MS ever announced plans for VFP beyond version .Next?

Oh.. btw.. I'm so fed up with the attitude and tone in your replies that this is the last response I'm sending to you. You can reply all you want, but response is not coming. I'm tired of it all and it is no longer worth my time.

>
>No - but I am not the one making the statement here. Think for a moment how you have chosen to support your conclusion - the "logic" works like this:
>
>1. You make an assertion that has no basis in fact.
>2. You defend your conclusion based on the fact that I cannot prove a negative
>
>Let me tell you what I know to be the case: MS has not announced plans for VFP 10 or 11 - and you have stated matter of factly that there will be a VFP 10 and an 11. i.e., you have positively concluded that there will be 2 version beyond the next version WHICH HAS YET TO BE RELEASED!!
>
>Imagine if our system of justice worked like this:
>
>1. Sam accuses Dave of stealing $20
>2. Bob asks Sam how he knows that Dave stole $20.
>3. Sam ask's Bob how he knows Dave did not steal $20.
>
>i.e., you are making a circular argument.