no,no, no, I'm the biggest proponent of this (as anyone that uses my freeware knows). I wish there was a lot more from MS on .vfp. mtdll interop with ASP.NET and using both tools to their full potential. My point is that if MS is purposely de-emphasizing certain areas of vfp for the purpose of making a stronger case for using .NET in those areas, then it would be a little bit of manipulation going on, wouldn't you say?? Not that they can't or shouldn't do this - maybe I'm just pointing out the obvious...
>I think the primary purpose of this place is to provide support for VFP developers. And in that end - a good many VFP developers are incorporating .NET into their solutions. Are you suggesting they be turned away because those solutions are not "pure fox"?