>>I have long since given up the fight to try and get MS to promote and support Fox and the class of applications it can develop. IMO - the responses you are giving here now - with respect to VFP/Longhorn, etc - are confusing and incomplete. To this day - you guys are still trying to play the role of Switzerland (appologies to the Swiss) - by riding the fence.
>
>I don't think I have been lacking on specifics. If you have a specific question, ask it.


I said they were confusing and incomplete. You can still have a lot of specifics - and still be confusing and incomplete.

My point Ken is that you can't on one hand - let the cat out of the back with respect to VFP, Longhorn, Yukon, etc - to the extent of saying that there will be "some" things VFP will not be able to leverage and then on the other hand - not clarify that statement. You say here you have not been lacking on specifics yet in another post - you specfically say that you cannot get into specifics.

Unless you are/were prepared to go into the requisite level of detail, you either should have:

1. Clarified by going into details that you say you cannot go into or;
2. Taken responses to a private forum or ;
3. Spun the answer in a content-neutral way.

Given the state of affairs - people have a right to know just how much behind the 8 ball they "may" be...

< JVP >