>>I substituted a Session Class for a Customer Class as the "container" for a DLL (automation) server - ant it worked!
>>
>>It seems Session has less overhead than Custom.
>>
>>Will this give me any head aches? Is the a "better" VFP-8 class to contain methods and properties for an automation server?
>
>Don't think so. In fact, COM samples in the VFP 8.0 docs use the Session object. Wouldn't hurt, though to read the docs. Some settings (SET SAFETY comes to mind) are different and don't have to be set.

Thanks - I needed that:-)