I already offered AVFP to MS for free to include with vfp, but, they're not interested in improvements that will compete with .net or give people a reason not to buy vs.net, apparently.
>Thanks.
>
>Just hoping Ken Levy will pay more attention and seriously to VFP, and hoping Ken will response to my post to let us know how he think about "80% of enchance are base on customer request are good practice to keep VFP alive".
>
>Beside, you contribution to VFP (ActiveVFP) are most appreciated. Well done. :)
>
>You know, sometime I just dream that if MS does not have resource to develop WEB Control classes (like .net), new report writer for VFP, why don't they just buy the product like ActiveVFP, report writer like Mind Eye, to enchance the feature of VFP. This is what they always pratice. :)
>
>TIA.