Well, yes, in a way. The fact that most of the first articles in the mag were mostly VFP and now there's pretty much nothing for vfp - yet you guys are still hanging around the vfp community. Again, there's nothing wrong with this generally - I just personally don't like this sort of thing where you profess such an interest in vfp yet don't write about it or spend much time with it. The likely reason is that you're trying to move people over to .NET. Again, nothing wrong with this generally...
>Claude,
>
>>No paronoia, just a discussion.. "They" as you know is Microsoft - their advertising dollars, the access they allow to the development teams, what they plan on doing in the future etc. The choice of Code Mag was obviously to go that route. Nothing wrong with that - I'm just getting tired of people pretending they're one thing and actually being another..
>
>As far as I know, we're not pretending to be anything other than what we are -- an in-depth technical magazine for Microsoft-focused developers and IT Managers. Our slogan at the top of the magazine is "Microsoft technologies in-depth" and there is a .NET splash in red in the upper-left corner.
>
>Do you think we are pretending to be something else?