>
I assume that Mike Helland made some remarks that caused this to happen.
>
That would be a good bet....
>
I asked others whether they too think that Foxtalk has deterioriated, in number of articles and in quality. I once again ask your opinion. Moreover, if you agree, what do you think should be done about it?
>
There are several problems with FoxTalk. I believe Whil has been at the helm since 1996 or 1997 (maybe earlier). After 7 years (and perhaps more) - a magazine needs a change. Also, you generally have the same group of people regularly contributing. I started writing for Foxtalk in 1993 and stopped in 1999. After 5 years - I had enough. You have some new contributors - but for the most part - there is a stale-ness to the content.
Is FoxTalk still a good magazine? Yes - but it is not even close to being the magazine it was in the years 1995 - 1999.
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only