>Hi Sam,
>
>>Is SQL Server 2000 in anyway based on VFP? I have a bet riding on this. :)
>
>I sooooo hope you're betting that SQL Server 2000 isn't based on VFP. Why? Because it isn't.

Thanks Jim, I am betting it isn't. :)

Unfortunatly, it won't be easy to win my position. There is speculation that "it is, MS just isn't saying so." and then the amount of "rushmore" that may or not be there and how much "rushmore" is of VFP and if you choose to call "rushmore" VFP. Dizzy?

I may have to claim a "moral" victory on this one.

Take care.
-Sam

ps. Loved your class in Raleigh.