>Interesting concept. Seems like you could potentially miss live data doing that, however.
>
>I suspect that SQL Server doesn't have the types of problems that VFP has with pushing data over the wire. From what I can see and what I understand, vfp is very inefficient when it comes to what it pushes over the wire ( data, indexes and the like ).

Actually, Dave, I'd have to say that VFP is relatively efficient when it is given the chance to be so. Sure, nothing can beat only ever sending the exact data you need, but short of that Rushmore provides good efficiency when well exploited. Systems with 250+ users and GBs of data can get sub-second response time using VFP.

cheers


>
>Dave