At least you agree that a lot of the material that is being published today is re-cycled - and that there is not a lot of new territory to cover in Fox.

I find it hard to believe that there is as much feedback today as there was in 1993. Prior to 1993 - when FPA was first published, I have to believe that Databased Advisor received quite a bit of feedback.

Bottom line - your assertion is that people are "afraid" to bother the author. I reject that conclusion. I think it is more about apathy - for the reasons I stated - and reasons you don't reject. Nonetheless, I respect your conclusion - but I do disagree with it.


>>When you get down to it Tamar - there is not that much new territory to cover in FoxPro. For a long time, a lot of material has been recycled - sometimes 2-3 or more times over.
>
>Since the pattern of feedback hasn't changed in the nearly 15 years I've been writing about Fox, I don't think that's relevant.
>
>Tamar