Russell:

I think it is next to impossible for a tool like this to provide source with their demo, because that would give away the store.

I'm wondering how could MindsEye Wrod output be "much, much faster than FRX2Any", since I suppose they both use Office Automation. Does MindsEye actually claim this in their literature?

In any case, I imagine they are both very good products -- I just liked frx2any better at the time I needed to make the choice, about 8 months ago, and it has served me very well.


Pertti

>>>No, FRX2Any is NOT a separate APP, if you are using the "developer" version. When you compile it into your EXE it becomes part of it. No need to send any additional APPs. The thing about the APP not being part of the exe has to do with the "lesser" version, which you can not modify or compile into your exe, since you don't have the source or the class libraries available for compilation.
>
>Yes, I understood that. I was just saying that I didn't care about the form FRX2Any took, I just wanted specific results. Obviously, if you get the source, then it is compiled into the EXE and not run as a separate APP.
>
>I'm looking seriously an MindsEye. Rich has just added an output to Word (in his latest beta) and claims a speed much, much faster than FRX2Any.
>
>Thanks again.
>
>Russell