>>Talking about premises and conclusions...
>
>>A There is no one single definition of what a data-engine is.
>
>Did you see the google page? Multiple definitons.
>
>>B Walter's argument is that ADO .NET does not qualify as a dataengine.
>
>That is his argument as stated in his own words.
>
>>C Looking at the various defintions - it is clear that ADO .NET fits squarely within those defintions.
>
>Tell you what - you show me how ADO .NET does not fit within those defintions. Looking at the MS link - ADO .NET clearly fits within that defintion alone.
John,
I was only trying to apply Logical Theory. No need to google, no need for me to agree or disagree with either B or C. Just trying to think logical..
Your reaction showed me you entirely missed my point.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
