>I was not making the argument - I was responding to the argument. No question that Fox + DBF's is flexible. The point I made was that .NET + SQL Server can be just as flexible. Put another way - it cannot be demonstrated that .NET + SQL Server is any less flexible than Fox + DBF's.

John, I think that I can demonstrate .NET + SQL Server _is_ less flexible.

Now, how do we go about agreeing on what defines a flexible solution?

>Nice try....

I can only assume that you've lost touch with reality or you are simply attempting to confuse anyone reading these messages.