John,

>>>Your argument was that Fox would be MORE flexible. All I have to do is find 1 instance where that is true - and your argument is defeated. I can find a lot more - but 1 is all it takes....
>>
>>
>Are you serious? I'll give you an honest chance to confrim that you think this is rational before objecting to its obvious irrationality!
>>
>
>I am absolutely serious.... If you contend that Fox is absolutely more flexible then all I really need to do is find 1 signficant example where it is not.

Then you obviouslly have no capacity for thought beyond black and white issues. Nice talking to you, simpleton.