>I did not frame the argument - Mike did. He kicked it off by saying Fox was more flexible. He threw it to me to establish some initial rules. I did.
I attempted to cooperatively find a variety of rules that would most accurately give us a summary of the validty of the "fact" as you stated it.
I did not flinch at your requirements. You flinched at mine. Thats a demonstration of unreasonability.
I sincerely hope that you have no real attachment to this discussion and are merely trying to outwit your opponent on whatever soggy grounds that you can as a practice excersize in debate.
If so, I'll offer you this contrstuctive criticism: you need some work.
Good day.
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement